Madhuri Shivaji Burud vs Nobody — 5/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO100001202026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
64/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhuri Shivaji Burud
Adv. A. S. Podjale
-
2.Tanay Shivaji Burud
Adv. A. S. Podjale
-
3.Swaraj Shivaji Burud
Adv. Ajit kiran Bage patil
-
4.Shanta Tukaram Burud
Adv. A. S. Podjale
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nobody
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 5/2026 The court granted the petition by Madhuri Shivaji Burud, Tanay Shivaji Burud, and Swaraj Shivaji Burud for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827. The deceased, Shivaji Tukaram Burud (died 18.06.2024), was a Maharashtra State Transport employee, and petitioners 1-4 were declared his legal heirs. The court found petitioner 1 to be the widow, petitioners 2-3 to be major sons, and petitioner 4 to be a minor daughter, all entitled to succession rights. The heirship certificate was issued subject to court fee payment and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
Summary of Case 5/2026 The court granted the petition by Madhuri Shivaji Burud, Tanay Shivaji Burud, and Swaraj Shivaji Burud for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827. The deceased, Shivaji Tukaram Burud (died 18.06.2024), was a Maharashtra State Transport employee, and petitioners 1-4 were declared his legal heirs. The court found petitioner 1 to be the widow, petitioners 2-3 to be major sons, and petitioner 4 to be a minor daughter, all entitled to succession rights. The heirship certificate was issued subject to court fee payment and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts