Madhuri Shivaji Burud vs Nobody — 5/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO100001202026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

64/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Madhuri Shivaji Burud

Adv. A. S. Podjale

Tanay Shivaji Burud

Adv. A. S. Podjale

Swaraj Shivaji Burud

Adv. Ajit kiran Bage patil

Shanta Tukaram Burud

Adv. A. S. Podjale

Respondent(s)

Nobody

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

31-01-2026

Proclomation

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 5/2026 The court granted the petition by Madhuri Shivaji Burud, Tanay Shivaji Burud, and Swaraj Shivaji Burud for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827. The deceased, Shivaji Tukaram Burud (died 18.06.2024), was a Maharashtra State Transport employee, and petitioners 1-4 were declared his legal heirs. The court found petitioner 1 to be the widow, petitioners 2-3 to be major sons, and petitioner 4 to be a minor daughter, all entitled to succession rights. The heirship certificate was issued subject to court fee payment and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 5/2026 The court granted the petition by Madhuri Shivaji Burud, Tanay Shivaji Burud, and Swaraj Shivaji Burud for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Succession Act, 1827. The deceased, Shivaji Tukaram Burud (died 18.06.2024), was a Maharashtra State Transport employee, and petitioners 1-4 were declared his legal heirs. The court found petitioner 1 to be the widow, petitioners 2-3 to be major sons, and petitioner 4 to be a minor daughter, all entitled to succession rights. The heirship certificate was issued subject to court fee payment and applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case