Vinayak Vasantrao Uprate vs Vasant Sidram Uprate — 25/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100001152026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

60/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Partition Act Section 4 and 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinayak Vasantrao Uprate

    Adv. S. N. Rangnekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Sidram Uprate

  2. 2.Vaibhav Vasantrao Uprate

  3. 3.Jotiba Krishna Uprate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed Civil Suit No. 25/2026 filed by Vinayak Vasantrao Uprate against Vasant Sidram Uprate and others as withdrawn on 16/03/2026. The plaintiff requested withdrawal to file a fresh suit with the same cause of action, which the court accepted. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per rules, and the proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Civil Suit No. 25/2026 filed by Vinayak Vasantrao Uprate against Vasant Sidram Uprate and others as withdrawn on 16/03/2026. The plaintiff requested withdrawal to file a fresh suit with the same cause of action, which the court accepted. Court fees were ordered to be refunded as per rules, and the proceedings were closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case