Lagama Siddhappa Dhangar D.H. Mahadeo Lagama Dhangar etc 6 vs Shri. Maruti Rama Patil etc 3 Advocate - Shantinath S. Patil — 600052/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100001062014
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600130/2014
Filing Date
24-02-2014
Registration No
600052/2014
Registration Date
27-02-2014
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lagama Siddhappa Dhangar D.H. Mahadeo Lagama Dhangar etc 6
Adv. S. S. Patil
Kruhanabai Lagama Dhanagar
Sidhappa Lagam Dhanagar
Sadashiv Lagama Dhanagar
Akkatai Suresh Redekaar
Kashvva Sidhappa Patil
Respondent(s)
Shri. Maruti Rama Patil etc 3 Advocate - Shantinath S. Patil
Shivarai Kenchappa Pujari(Legal Heir)
Branch Manage, Veershaiv co co Bank
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 10-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 12-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 16-01-2026 | Steps | |
| 12-12-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: In case R.K. No. 52/2014 (Lagma v. Maruti), the petition filed by the plaintiff to substitute the legal heirs of Defendant No. 2 Shiraai Ke Chappa Purjari (who died on 09/01/2021) was allowed/granted. The court approved the plaintiff's application to correct the record by substituting the defendant's heirs and also granted relief regarding the abatement order. The plaintiff was directed to make proper corrections to the case record and file the amended record within the specified timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case R.K. No. 52/2014 (Lagma v. Maruti), the petition filed by the plaintiff to substitute the legal heirs of Defendant No. 2 Shiraai Ke Chappa Purjari (who died on 09/01/2021) was allowed/granted. The court approved the plaintiff's application to correct the record by substituting the defendant's heirs and also granted relief regarding the abatement order. The plaintiff was directed to make proper corrections to the case record and file the amended record within the specified timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts