1- Subhash Govind Gawade vs 1- Chandagad Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Chandagad — 70/2025

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 5,34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHKO090006922025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

21st July 2026

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

713/2025

Filing Date

29-11-2025

Registration No

70/2025

Registration Date

04-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

4-

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 5,34,38

Petitioner(s)

1- Subhash Govind Gawade

Adv. M. V. Patil

2- Sunita Subhash Gawade

Adv. M. V. Patil

Respondent(s)

1- Chandagad Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Chandagad

2- Authorised Officer Chandagad Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Chandagad

3- Muralidhar Balsheth Ballal

4- Tahasildar,Chandgad

5- Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur

Hearing History

Judge: 4-

09-06-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

08-05-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

05-05-2026

Order

28-04-2026

Order

21-04-2026

Order

Interim Orders

08-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Gawade v. Chandagad Urban Co-op Bank Ltd (2025) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' temporary injunction application. The plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case challenging the bank's SARFAESI auction proceedings as time-barred, and the court found the balance of convenience favored defendant No.3, the auction purchaser, who would suffer irreparable loss if renovation work were halted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gawade v. Chandagad Urban Co-op Bank Ltd (2025) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' temporary injunction application. The plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case challenging the bank's SARFAESI auction proceedings as time-barred, and the court found the balance of convenience favored defendant No.3, the auction purchaser, who would suffer irreparable loss if renovation work were halted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case