Malagonda Virgonda Patil vs Collector, Kolhapur — 193/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,38,39. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090006032025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-10-2025

Filing Number

621/2025

Filing Date

08-10-2025

Registration No

193/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36,38,39

Petitioner(s)

Malagonda Virgonda Patil

Adv. S. B. Desai

2- Ramesh Tejgonda Patil

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

3- Udaykumar Nagappa Bhuragude

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

4- Suhas Mahadev Kadukar

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

5- Bhausaheb Shankargonda Patil

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

6- Mahavir Annappa Patil

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

7- Abhay Mahavir Patil

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

8- Vijay Arjun Kadukar

Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA

Respondent(s)

Collector, Kolhapur

2- Hon Sarpanch Gramvikas Adhikariso

Adv. बी. बी. घाटगे

3- Vitthal Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Vikas Seva Sansth Ltd

Adv. ए. एस. पाटील

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

24-04-2026

Written Statement

08-04-2026

Written Statement

02-04-2026

Written Statement

27-03-2026

Written Statement

17-03-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

24-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 193/2025, the court extended the status-quo till the next hearing date, conditioned on the plaintiff presenting arguments positively on that date. The defendant had already argued his case, and the court noted that mechanical extension without plaintiff's argument would defeat the purpose of the interim injunction application. If the plaintiff fails to argue on the next date, the status-quo extension will not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 193/2025, the court extended the status-quo till the next hearing date, conditioned on the plaintiff presenting arguments positively on that date. The defendant had already argued his case, and the court noted that mechanical extension without plaintiff's argument would defeat the purpose of the interim injunction application. If the plaintiff fails to argue on the next date, the status-quo extension will not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case