Malagonda Virgonda Patil vs Collector, Kolhapur — 193/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,38,39. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090006032025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
621/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
193/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malagonda Virgonda Patil
Adv. S. B. Desai
2- Ramesh Tejgonda Patil
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
3- Udaykumar Nagappa Bhuragude
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
4- Suhas Mahadev Kadukar
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
5- Bhausaheb Shankargonda Patil
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
6- Mahavir Annappa Patil
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
7- Abhay Mahavir Patil
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
8- Vijay Arjun Kadukar
Adv. DESAI SANJAY BANNAPPA
Respondent(s)
Collector, Kolhapur
2- Hon Sarpanch Gramvikas Adhikariso
Adv. बी. बी. घाटगे
3- Vitthal Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Vikas Seva Sansth Ltd
Adv. ए. एस. पाटील
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 08-04-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 02-04-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 193/2025, the court extended the status-quo till the next hearing date, conditioned on the plaintiff presenting arguments positively on that date. The defendant had already argued his case, and the court noted that mechanical extension without plaintiff's argument would defeat the purpose of the interim injunction application. If the plaintiff fails to argue on the next date, the status-quo extension will not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 193/2025, the court extended the status-quo till the next hearing date, conditioned on the plaintiff presenting arguments positively on that date. The defendant had already argued his case, and the court noted that mechanical extension without plaintiff's argument would defeat the purpose of the interim injunction application. If the plaintiff fails to argue on the next date, the status-quo extension will not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts