Bhiku Tukaram Sadavar vs Maharashtra Government Through Collector, Kolhaput Dist Kolhapur — 235/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34 and 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 14-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090005682024

e-Filing Number

27-09-2024

Filing Number

590/2024

Filing Date

08-Oct-2024

Registration No

235/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

4-

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34 and 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhiku Tukaram Sadavar

    Adv. SURUTKAR KRISHNAJI SHIVAJI

  2. 2.Pandurang Arjun Sadavar

    Adv. SURUTKAR KRISHNAJI SHIVAJI

  3. 3.Namadev Bhiku Sadavar

    Adv. SURUTKAR KRISHNAJI SHIVAJI

  4. 4.Rukmana Ramu Sadavr

    Adv. SURUTKAR KRISHNAJI SHIVAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Government Through Collector, Kolhaput Dist Kolhapur

  2. 2.Tahsildar so, Chandgad

  3. 3.Kashinath Subrao Sadavar

  4. 4.Vishwnath Namadev Sadavr

  5. 5.Devappa Namadev Sadavr

  6. 6.Pundlik Babu Sadavr

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Issues

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Issues

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Formal Hearing

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Formal Hearing

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Formal Hearing

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Formal Hearing

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    Formal Hearing

  9. 15-Jul-2025

    Formal Hearing

  10. 10-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

  11. 08-Apr-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary: The petition filed by respondents 3-6 challenging a non-affidavit order is allowed. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 and permitted respondents 3-6 to file an affidavit, recognizing that their delay in filing was justified due to unavailability of tahsil records and age-related difficulties, and that the merits of the case require both parties' presence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 08-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  13. 18-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  14. 11-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  15. 07-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  17. 22-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 08-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 235/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by respondents 3-6 challenging a non-affidavit order is allowed. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 and permitted respondents 3-6 to file an affidavit, recognizing that their delay in filing was justified due to unavailability of tahsil records and age-related difficulties, and that the merits of the case require both parties' presence before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case