Dattu Dhondiba Paradhi(Legal Heir) vs The State Of Maharashtra-Collector — 5/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHKO090005062021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
577/2021
Filing Date
30-10-2021
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
27-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattu Dhondiba Paradhi(Legal Heir)
Adv. S. B. Patole1.
Droupati Dhondiba Paradhi(Legal Heir) 1.
Babu Dattu Paradhi(Legal Heir) 1.2.
Smt. Ranjana Babu Paradhi 1.2.
Parshram Babu Paradhi
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Collector
Sub- Divisional Officer and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Gadhinglaj.
Executive Engineer, Minor Project Department, Kolhapur
Laxman Govind Gavade
Shankar Appa Upalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered that two simultaneous execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. No payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all future payment applications must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered that two simultaneous execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. No payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all future payment applications must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts