Manohar Fakira Kamble vs Prashant Dinkar Sambrekar Advocate - Meena M. Bide — 158/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHKO090004132018
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
508/2018
Filing Date
20-08-2018
Registration No
158/2018
Registration Date
20-08-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Fakira Kamble
Adv. A. S. Kamble
Sunita Manohar Kamble
Adv. A. S. Kamble
Respondent(s)
Prashant Dinkar Sambrekar Advocate - Meena M. Bide
Junior Engineer
Adv. Meena M. Bide
Executive Engineer
Adv. Meena M. Bide
Inspector Engg.
Adv. Meena M. Bide
Asstt. Engg.
Adv. Meena M. Bide
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by J.D. to stay the attachment warrant issued against M.S.E.B. for Rs. 2 lakhs was allowed. The court granted the stay of the attachment warrant on the condition that J.D. deposits the amount as early as possible, considering J.D.'s willingness to deposit the sum as per their office circular and the pending appeal against the court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by J.D. to stay the attachment warrant issued against M.S.E.B. for Rs. 2 lakhs was allowed. The court granted the stay of the attachment warrant on the condition that J.D. deposits the amount as early as possible, considering J.D.'s willingness to deposit the sum as per their office circular and the pending appeal against the court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts