Megha Dundappa Madkari vs Dundappa Balappa Madkari — 45/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34and38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHKO090003782023
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
19-07-2023
Filing Number
445/2023
Filing Date
19-07-2023
Registration No
45/2023
Registration Date
25-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Megha Dundappa Madkari
Adv. PATIL MARUTI VITHOBA
Respondent(s)
Dundappa Balappa Madkari
Savita Dundappa Madkari
Mauli Dundappa Madkari Legal Representative Savita Dundappa Madkari
Satgonda Balappa Madkari
Sushila Shankar Balikannawar
Sugandha Uday Shinde
The Gadhinglaj Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Gadhinglaj
The Gadhinglaj Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Chairman By Gadhinglaj
The Gadhinglaj Urban Co Op Bank Ltd Gadhinglaj Head Office Gadhinglaj Authorised Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Evidence Part Heard
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 12-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 10-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Megha Dundappa Madkari v. Dundappa Balappa Madkari (45/2023) The court allowed the application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against defendants 7-9, who had filed their written statement late without justifiable cause. The court condoned the delay based on natural justice principles, allowing the written statement to be taken on record subject to defendants 7-9 collectively paying Rs. 1,000 as exemplary cost to the plaintiff before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Megha Dundappa Madkari v. Dundappa Balappa Madkari (45/2023) The court allowed the application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order against defendants 7-9, who had filed their written statement late without justifiable cause. The court condoned the delay based on natural justice principles, allowing the written statement to be taken on record subject to defendants 7-9 collectively paying Rs. 1,000 as exemplary cost to the plaintiff before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts