Laxman Govind Gavade vs The State Of Maharashtra-Collector — 8/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHKO090003702020
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
454/2020
Filing Date
11-11-2020
Registration No
8/2021
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxman Govind Gavade
Adv. S. B. Patole
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Collector
Sub - Divisional Officer, And Special Land Acquisition Officer.
Executive Engineer.
Dattu Dhondiba Paradhi
Shankar Appa Upalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. The court also held that no payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all future payment applications must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. The court also held that no payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and all future payment applications must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts