Aappa Santu Choukulkar Represented by Power of Attorney - Raju Aappa Choukulkar vs The State Of Maharashtra-Collector — 23/2021
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 5. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHKO090002662021
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
362/2021
Filing Date
27-07-2021
Registration No
23/2021
Registration Date
24-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Aappa Santu Choukulkar Represented by Power of Attorney - Raju Aappa Choukulkar
Adv. A. S. Kamble
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Collector
Sub Divisional Officer, Special Land Acquisition officer, Gadhinglaj
Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 04-11-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 06-10-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 22-07-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. Additionally, no payment orders will be issued in these execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must be signed by all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. No. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. Additionally, no payment orders will be issued in these execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must be signed by all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts