Dattu Dhondiba Pardhi(Legal Heir) vs The State Of Maharashtra-Collector — 22/2021
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 5,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHKO090002652021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
361/2021
Filing Date
27-07-2021
Registration No
22/2021
Registration Date
24-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattu Dhondiba Pardhi(Legal Heir)
Adv. A. S. Kamble1.
Ambubai Manohar Yadav
Adv. A. S. Kamble
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Collector
Sub Division officer, Special Land Acquisition Officer, Gadhinglaj
Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. Nos. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. Additionally, no payment orders will be made in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered that two execution petitions (L.A.R. Nos. 23/2021 and 24/2021) filed by the same decree holder through different advocates be clubbed together, with the decree holder directed to continue with only one petition and withdraw the other. Additionally, no payment orders will be made in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts