Shri. Dattatray Hari Patil vs Shri. Hari Krushna Patil Advocate - S. S. Kot — 14/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 29. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHKO090002422016
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
317/2016
Filing Date
13-06-2016
Registration No
14/2016
Registration Date
13-06-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Dattatray Hari Patil
Adv. A. M. Sawant
Respondent(s)
Shri. Hari Krushna Patil Advocate - S. S. Kot
Kum. Nivruti Yashwant Patil
Kum. Dyneshwar Yashwant Patil
Shamrao Ganpati Narvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application to amend the plaint and add a proposed defendant (purchaser of suit property) was allowed. The court found the proposed defendant to be a necessary party to decide the real controversy and permitted the plaintiff to carry out the proposed amendment. The plaintiff must file a copy of the amended plaint by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application to amend the plaint and add a proposed defendant (purchaser of suit property) was allowed. The court found the proposed defendant to be a necessary party to decide the real controversy and permitted the plaintiff to carry out the proposed amendment. The plaintiff must file a copy of the amended plaint by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts