Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil vs Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil — 1/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090001922025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-04-2025
Filing Number
203/2025
Filing Date
07-04-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
02-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil
Adv. PATIL MARUTI VITHOBA
Respondent(s)
Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil
1B- Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Pramod Prakash Patil
2- Mining Officer,KOlhapur
3- Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Ex-Parte Order
Order
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 07-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts