Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil vs Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil — 1/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Ex-Parte Order Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090001922025

e-Filing Number

04-04-2025

Filing Number

203/2025

Filing Date

07-Apr-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

02-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil

    Adv. PATIL MARUTI VITHOBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil

  2. 2.1B- Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Pramod Prakash Patil

  3. 3.2- Mining Officer,KOlhapur

  4. 4.3- Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  14. 01-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  16. 19-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  17. 29-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  18. 07-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 07-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case