Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil vs Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil — 1/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090001922025

Ex-Parte Order

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2025

Filing Number

203/2025

Filing Date

07-04-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

02-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,39

Petitioner(s)

Atharv Kallappa Patil through power of attorney Kallappa Ningappa Patil

Adv. PATIL MARUTI VITHOBA

Respondent(s)

Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Prakash Bhimrao Patil

1B- Me Patils Sand Crushers L L P Partnership Firm through partner Pramod Prakash Patil

2- Mining Officer,KOlhapur

3- Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

20-04-2026

Ex-Parte Order

16-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

07-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

23-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Commercial Suit No. 01/2025 Outcome: The defendant's application to reject or return the plaint was dismissed. The court upheld the commercial suit's maintainability against the government, rejecting the defendant's contradictory argument. The court found no legal bar under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against filing commercial suits against the government and noted the defendant's inconsistent position—having originally insisted the dispute be registered as commercial, then later arguing it wasn't maintainable on that basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case