Shivaji Aai Kallavva Mang vs Collector, Kolhapur — 46/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 24. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090001572025
Next Hearing
18th July 2026
e-Filing Number
26-03-2025
Filing Number
166/2025
Filing Date
26-03-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Aai Kallavva Mang
Adv. S. S. Nikam
2- Annasaheb Nanappa Bidre
Adv. NIKAM SHANKAR SUBHANA
3- Bharamu Ramchadra Vadrale
Adv. NIKAM SHANKAR SUBHANA
Respondent(s)
Collector, Kolhapur
2- Tashildar, Gadhinglaj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 05-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case 46/2025 Summary: The petition filed by Shivaji Aai Kallavva Mang and two others seeking to set aside non-adjudication orders passed against respondents 4-8, 12(a), 12(k), 12(d), and 14-17 was ALLOWED with partial relief. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 on the petitioners and set aside the non-adjudication orders against the specified respondents, directing their cases to proceed on merits. The court found the delay in filing affidavits justified due to respondents' age, agricultural occupation, and lack of proper legal guidance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 46/2025 Summary: The petition filed by Shivaji Aai Kallavva Mang and two others seeking to set aside non-adjudication orders passed against respondents 4-8, 12(a), 12(k), 12(d), and 14-17 was ALLOWED with partial relief. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 500 on the petitioners and set aside the non-adjudication orders against the specified respondents, directing their cases to proceed on merits. The court found the delay in filing affidavits justified due to respondents' age, agricultural occupation, and lack of proper legal guidance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts