Shankar Appa Upalkar vs The State Of Maharashtra-Collector — 13/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
L.R.DKST. - Execution of Land Reference Award
CNR: MHKO090001572021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
215/2021
Filing Date
30-03-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
30-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankar Appa Upalkar
Adv. S. B. Patole
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Collector
Sub - Divisional Officer, And Special Land Acquisition Officer.
Executive Engineer.
Laxman Govind Gavade
Dattu Dhondiba Paradhi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court directed the decree holder to consolidate two simultaneously filed execution petitions (L.A.R. Nos. 23/2021 and 24/2021) into one, with the decree holder required to withdraw the other or face suitable orders. Additionally, no payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court directed the decree holder to consolidate two simultaneously filed execution petitions (L.A.R. Nos. 23/2021 and 24/2021) into one, with the decree holder required to withdraw the other or face suitable orders. Additionally, no payment orders will be issued in any execution petitions unless there is proper compliance with Order XXI Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and any payment application must bear signatures of all parties and their advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts