Atharv Kallappa Patil vs District Mining Officer Kolhapur — 55/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090001432026
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
147/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
4-
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Atharv Kallappa Patil
Adv. M. V. Patil
Respondent(s)
District Mining Officer Kolhapur
Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur
Prakash Bhimrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 4-
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction to restrain the District Mining Officer from enforcing a recovery notice for royalty and penalty. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, it determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff and that no irreparable loss requiring urgent relief was demonstrated. The suit is adjourned for the defendants' appearance, and the court directed the plaintiff to pursue personal hearing with the mining officer and pay due royalty immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction to restrain the District Mining Officer from enforcing a recovery notice for royalty and penalty. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, it determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff and that no irreparable loss requiring urgent relief was demonstrated. The suit is adjourned for the defendants' appearance, and the court directed the plaintiff to pursue personal hearing with the mining officer and pay due royalty immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts