Atharv Kallappa Patil vs District Mining Officer Kolhapur — 55/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Awaiting Notice Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090001432026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

147/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

4-

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Atharv Kallappa Patil

    Adv. M. V. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.District Mining Officer Kolhapur

  2. 2.Government Of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur

  3. 3.Prakash Bhimrao Patil

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Notice

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction to restrain the District Mining Officer from enforcing a recovery notice for royalty and penalty. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, it determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff and that no irreparable loss requiring urgent relief was demonstrated. The suit is adjourned for the defendants' appearance, and the court directed the plaintiff to pursue personal hearing with the mining officer and pay due royalty immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction to restrain the District Mining Officer from enforcing a recovery notice for royalty and penalty. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case, it determined that the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff and that no irreparable loss requiring urgent relief was demonstrated. The suit is adjourned for the defendants' appearance, and the court directed the plaintiff to pursue personal hearing with the mining officer and pay due royalty immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case