Suresh Shantaram Patkar vs State of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur Advocate - S. A. Teli — 500064/2011
Case under Ia/1/2019 Classification : Leave to Introduce Oral or Documentary Evidence1 Section Suresh Shantaram PatkarState of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090001382011
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5000185/2011
Filing Date
18-04-2011
Registration No
500064/2011
Registration Date
19-04-2011
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Shantaram Patkar
Adv. B. B. Ghatge
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Collector Kolhapur Advocate - S. A. Teli
Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Officer No. 12
Mahadev Gurling Somshetti(Legal Heir)
Virbhadra Gurling Somshetti
Ashok Krushna Chimane
Asmita Ashok Chimane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Compliance
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Compliance | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 03-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 64/2011, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint by correcting the name of defendant no. 3(f) from "Someshwari" to "Avani." The court found the mistake to be inadvertent and technical in nature, not affecting the suit's substance. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended plaint copy by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 64/2011, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint by correcting the name of defendant no. 3(f) from "Someshwari" to "Avani." The court found the mistake to be inadvertent and technical in nature, not affecting the suit's substance. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended plaint copy by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts