Aainy Hairi Farnandis vs Aailan Hairi Farnandis Advocate - V. G. Desai — 11/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHKO090001252021

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200/2021

Filing Date

20-03-2021

Registration No

11/2021

Registration Date

20-03-2021

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
IA/1/2023 Classification : Interrogatories Section Aainy Hairi Farnandis

Petitioner(s)

Aainy Hairi Farnandis

Adv. M. V. Patil

Respondent(s)

Aailan Hairi Farnandis Advocate - V. G. Desai

Sheetal Aailan Farnandis

Simplisiya Princetan Disoza

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

07-04-2026

Defence Evidence

10-03-2026

Defence Evidence

21-02-2026

Defence Evidence

17-02-2026

Defence Evidence

20-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

04-04-2022
Order on T.I.
22-04-2025
Evidence
20-01-2026
Evidence
20-01-2026
Evidence

Summary of Court Order Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 37/2020, Judgment Order No. 93/K Outcome: The court dismissed Defendant No. 7's cross-examination and allowed cross-examination by Defendants 2, 5, and 6 through their counsel. Defendants 1, 3, and 4 were declared absent through counsel, so cross-examination on their behalf was not conducted. The court rejected Defendant No. 7's counter-case (ulat tapas) and accepted counter-cases filed by Defendants 2, 5, and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Order Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 37/2020, Judgment Order No. 93/K Outcome: The court dismissed Defendant No. 7's cross-examination and allowed cross-examination by Defendants 2, 5, and 6 through their counsel. Defendants 1, 3, and 4 were declared absent through counsel, so cross-examination on their behalf was not conducted. The court rejected Defendant No. 7's counter-case (ulat tapas) and accepted counter-cases filed by Defendants 2, 5, and 6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case