Namdeo Vitthal Narvekar vs Collector, Kolhapur — 30/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39. Status: Formal Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Formal Hearing Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090000982025

e-Filing Number

14-02-2025

Filing Number

102/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

30/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Namdeo Vitthal Narvekar

    Adv. M. V. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Collector, Kolhapur

  2. 2.2- District Mining Officer Kolhapur

  3. 3.3- Tashildar, Ajara

  4. 4.4- Suryakant Namdeo Narvekar

  5. 5.5- ISC Project Private Limited Pune through authorised reprensatative Dhananjay Dattatray Gavali

    Adv. Rohan A. Patil

  6. 6.6- Mahesh Annaji Bhosale

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  10. 21-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  11. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  16. 24-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 30/2025 Outcome: Defendant No.5's application for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff (Namdeo Vitthal Narvekar) has sufficient cause of action and locus standi to challenge a property transaction, claiming the property is held benami in the defendant's name. The court held that whether the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act applies requires detailed evidence and trial, not threshold determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  20. 28-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  21. 15-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 30/2025 Outcome: Defendant No.5's application for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff (Namdeo Vitthal Narvekar) has sufficient cause of action and locus standi to challenge a property transaction, claiming the property is held benami in the defendant's name. The court held that whether the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act applies requires detailed evidence and trial, not threshold determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case