Shankar Maruti Patil vs Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Maltistate Co-op. Cradit Society ltd., Jaysingpur — 74/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090000982023

Filing Number

157/2023

Filing Date

09-Mar-2023

Registration No

74/2023

Registration Date

29-Mar-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

4-

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shankar Maruti Patil

    Adv. M. V. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Maltistate Co-op. Cradit Society ltd., Jaysingpur

  2. 2.Karmveer Bhaurao Patil Maltistate co-op. cradit Soci. Ltd., Jaysingpur through Bhauso Kumtale

  3. 3.The State Of Maharashtra-Collector

  4. 4.Divisional Sub Registrar, Co-operative Instutution Kolhapur

  5. 5.Asstt. Registrar, Co-Operative Institution Ajara

  6. 6.Tashildar, Ajara

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Issues

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Issues

  4. 13-Nov-2025

    Issues

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Formal Hearing

  6. 26-Aug-2025

    Formal Hearing

  7. 08-Jul-2025

    Formal Hearing

  8. 29-Apr-2025

    Formal Hearing

  9. 18-Mar-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  10. 18-Feb-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  11. 01-Jan-2025

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  12. 13-Nov-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  13. 03-Oct-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  14. 28-Aug-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  15. 25-Jul-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  16. 13-Jun-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  17. 10-Apr-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  18. 20-Mar-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    Formal Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  20. 14-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 74/2023 Summary: The Civil Judge allowed defendant no.3's (State of Maharashtra-Collector) application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (No WS) order dated 14.02.2024. Defendant no.3 had failed to file its written statement within the mandatory 90 days after appearance, citing unavailability of documents and non-deliberate delay. The court granted the application, set aside the No WS order, and permitted defendant no.3 to file its written statement on record, considering it is a State party and rejection would cause undue hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 14-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  22. 17-Jan-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  23. 03-Jan-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  24. 01-Nov-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  25. 06-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  26. 21-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  27. 09-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  28. 06-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  29. 01-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 09-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 74/2023 Summary: The Civil Judge allowed defendant no.3's (State of Maharashtra-Collector) application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (No WS) order dated 14.02.2024. Defendant no.3 had failed to file its written statement within the mandatory 90 days after appearance, citing unavailability of documents and non-deliberate delay. The court granted the application, set aside the No WS order, and permitted defendant no.3 to file its written statement on record, considering it is a State party and rejection would cause undue hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case