Vittal Rama Ravjiche Represented by Power of Attorney - Ramchandra Vittal Ravjiche vs Shivgonda Sidhai Kumbhar — 16/2021
Case under Contempt of Court Act Section 12,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO090000792021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
73/2021
Filing Date
24-02-2021
Registration No
16/2021
Registration Date
24-02-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vittal Rama Ravjiche Represented by Power of Attorney - Ramchandra Vittal Ravjiche
Adv. S. B. Desai
Respondent(s)
Shivgonda Sidhai Kumbhar
Sadashiv Bhima Kumbhar
Mavleshwar Guruputra Kumbhar
Sidhappa Guruputra Kumbhar
Grampanchayat Rajgoli Khurd.
Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Rajgoli Khurd.
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Rajgoli Khurd.
State Of Maharashtra Through Public Action Cell Officer, Tahasildar.
The B. D. O, Panchayat Samiti.
Chief Officer.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 20-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 09-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 16/2021 filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was allowed. The applicant is permitted to correct typographical errors in the application, with the amended copy to be filed by the next date of hearing. The court found no prejudice to the other party and allowed the proposed amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 16/2021 filed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was allowed. The applicant is permitted to correct typographical errors in the application, with the amended copy to be filed by the next date of hearing. The court found no prejudice to the other party and allowed the proposed amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts