The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Chandgad Police Station vs Ashok Gundu Patil Advocate - N. N. Gavade — 27/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,452,354-A. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHKO080007662023
e-Filing Number
26-10-2023
Filing Number
315/2023
Filing Date
26-10-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
26-10-2023
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
358
Police Station
Chandgad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Chandgad Police Station
Adv. App Gadhinglaj
Respondent(s)
Ashok Gundu Patil Advocate - N. N. Gavade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge at Gadhinglaj acquitted accused Ashok Gundu Patil of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A(1), 452, POCSO Act Sections 7, 8, 12, and Atrocities Act for allegedly sexually assaulting a minor Scheduled Caste girl on 16/09/2023. The court found discrepancies between the victim's and witness accounts regarding whether the accused was chased after the incident, and determined the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge at Gadhinglaj acquitted accused Ashok Gundu Patil of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A(1), 452, POCSO Act Sections 7, 8, 12, and Atrocities Act for allegedly sexually assaulting a minor Scheduled Caste girl on 16/09/2023. The court found discrepancies between the victim's and witness accounts regarding whether the accused was chased after the incident, and determined the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts