The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Gadhinglaj Police Station, Gadhinglaj. vs Shridhar Arjun Shingate — 20/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHKO080005092024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
205/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
12-08-2024
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
352
Police Station
Gadhinglaj Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector Gadhinglaj Police Station, Gadhinglaj.
Adv. S. A. Teli
Respondent(s)
Shridhar Arjun Shingate
Rahul Netaji Musale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge at Gadhinglaj acquitted both accused (Shridhar Arjun Shingate and Rahul Netaji Musale) of rape (IPC §376), voluntarily causing hurt (§323), and criminal intimidation (§506) charges. The court found critical inconsistencies in the victim's testimony, negative forensic reports showing no semen or blood evidence, medical examination revealing no violence marks, and suspicious circumstances including the victim's silence despite the alleged daytime assault in a populated residential area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge at Gadhinglaj acquitted both accused (Shridhar Arjun Shingate and Rahul Netaji Musale) of rape (IPC §376), voluntarily causing hurt (§323), and criminal intimidation (§506) charges. The court found critical inconsistencies in the victim's testimony, negative forensic reports showing no semen or blood evidence, medical examination revealing no violence marks, and suspicious circumstances including the victim's silence despite the alleged daytime assault in a populated residential area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts