Premika Dattatray Govekar vs Khaijal Mehbub Mulla Advocate - D. B. Nagonda — 5/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section sec166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHKO080003552024
e-Filing Number
04-05-2024
Filing Number
247/2024
Filing Date
06-05-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
08-05-2024
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Premika Dattatray Govekar
Adv. Omkar S Parab
Pranav Dattatray Govekar Minor Gardian Premika Govekar
Adv. Omkar S Parab
Respondent(s)
Khaijal Mehbub Mulla Advocate - D. B. Nagonda
Mahadev Manohar Kadam
Royal Sundaram Genral Insurance Co Insurer Of Crusher Vehicle
Adv. A. M. Bamane
Shantabai Annappa Rathod
Ganesh Annappa Rathod
Adv. S. B. Desai
Relaince General Insurance Co Insurer Of Maruti Suzuki Eco.
Adv. S. M. Gurav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadhinglaj (Case 05/2024) Decision: The tribunal partially allowed the petition, awarding Rs. 15,32,000 in compensation to the minor claimants for their father's death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Eco car driver (Opponent No. 5) solely negligent for rash overtaking that caused the fatal collision. Royal Sundaram General Insurance (Opponent No. 6) must pay the full amount with 9% interest, then recover from the vehicle owner (Opponent No. 4) due to policy breach—the driver lacked a valid license at accident time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadhinglaj (Case 05/2024) Decision: The tribunal partially allowed the petition, awarding Rs. 15,32,000 in compensation to the minor claimants for their father's death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Eco car driver (Opponent No. 5) solely negligent for rash overtaking that caused the fatal collision. Royal Sundaram General Insurance (Opponent No. 6) must pay the full amount with 9% interest, then recover from the vehicle owner (Opponent No. 4) due to policy breach—the driver lacked a valid license at accident time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts