Premika Dattatray Govekar vs Khaijal Mehbub Mulla Advocate - D. B. Nagonda — 5/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section sec166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHKO080003552024
e-Filing Number
04-05-2024
Filing Number
247/2024
Filing Date
06-May-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
08-May-2024
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Premika Dattatray Govekar
Adv. Omkar S Parab
-
2.Pranav Dattatray Govekar Minor Gardian Premika Govekar
Adv. Omkar S Parab
Respondent(s)
-
1.Khaijal Mehbub Mulla Advocate - D. B. Nagonda
-
2.Mahadev Manohar Kadam
-
3.Royal Sundaram Genral Insurance Co Insurer Of Crusher Vehicle
Adv. A. M. Bamane
-
4.Shantabai Annappa Rathod
-
5.Ganesh Annappa Rathod
Adv. S. B. Desai
-
6.Relaince General Insurance Co Insurer Of Maruti Suzuki Eco.
Adv. S. M. Gurav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadhinglaj (Case 05/2024) Decision: The tribunal partially allowed the petition, awarding Rs. 15,32,000 in compensation to the minor claimants for their father's death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Eco car driver (Opponent No. 5) solely negligent for rash overtaking that caused the fatal collision. Royal Sundaram General Insurance (Opponent No. 6) must pay the full amount with 9% interest, then recover from the vehicle owner (Opponent No. 4) due to policy breach—the driver lacked a valid license at accident time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgment
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
06-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
29-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
08-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
11-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
20-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
06-Nov-2025
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
28-Apr-2025
Compliance
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
03-Apr-2025
Compliance
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
20-Feb-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
28-Nov-2024
Issues
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
17-Oct-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
19-Sep-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
02-Aug-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
05-Jul-2024
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
09-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2024
Case Summary: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadhinglaj (Case 05/2024) Decision: The tribunal partially allowed the petition, awarding Rs. 15,32,000 in compensation to the minor claimants for their father's death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal found the Eco car driver (Opponent No. 5) solely negligent for rash overtaking that caused the fatal collision. Royal Sundaram General Insurance (Opponent No. 6) must pay the full amount with 9% interest, then recover from the vehicle owner (Opponent No. 4) due to policy breach—the driver lacked a valid license at accident time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts