Shri Bhairu Ganapati Patil alis Kesarkar vs Shri Sambhaji Joti Kesarkar Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 19/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order41rule1. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO080003222024
e-Filing Number
12-04-2024
Filing Number
224/2024
Filing Date
16-04-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Bhairu Ganapati Patil alis Kesarkar
Adv. S. N. Fagare
Shri Suryakant Ganpati Patil alis Kesarkar
Adv. S.N. Fagare
Respondent(s)
Shri Sambhaji Joti Kesarkar Advocate - R. I. Palkar
Smt Rangubai Joti Kesarkar
Suryakant Ganapati Patil Alis Kesarakr
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Appeal No. 19/2024 Court Decision: The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's dismissal of their suit. The court found the suit barred by res judicata, as the same land dispute between the same parties had been finally decided in previous litigation (R.C.A. No. 22/1998 and High Court Second Appeal No. 263/2002). The appellants failed to prove title or illegal dispossession; revenue records and prior court orders confirmed the respondents' lawful possession of their half-share of the agricultural land (Gat No. 242). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Appeal No. 19/2024 Court Decision: The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's dismissal of their suit. The court found the suit barred by res judicata, as the same land dispute between the same parties had been finally decided in previous litigation (R.C.A. No. 22/1998 and High Court Second Appeal No. 263/2002). The appellants failed to prove title or illegal dispossession; revenue records and prior court orders confirmed the respondents' lawful possession of their half-share of the agricultural land (Gat No. 242). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts