Ajit Pandurang Kesarkar vs Shantabai Bhairu Kamble Advocate - S. B. Shinde — 10/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,o 41 r 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHKO080002892022

Filing Number

190/2022

Filing Date

05-May-2022

Registration No

10/2022

Registration Date

05-May-2022

Court

Add District Court , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,o 41 r 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajit Pandurang Kesarkar

    Adv. S. D. Dhanawade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shantabai Bhairu Kamble Advocate - S. B. Shinde

  2. 2.Gajanan Bhairu Kamble

  3. 3.Dayanand Bhairu Kamble

  4. 4.The Chief Officer through Gadhinglaj Muncipal council Gadhinglaj

  5. 5.The Enginner Construction Department through Gadhinglaj Muncipal Council Gadhinglaj

  6. 6.State of Mahashatra Through Collector Office Kolhapur

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Regular Civil Appeal No. 10/2022 Outcome: The application to stay proceedings is dismissed. Ajit Pandurang Kesarkar sought to stay his appeal pending a Court Commissioner's report from a related civil suit, arguing the report would help establish encroachment on the property. The District Judge rejected this, finding the two suits involved different properties, different respondents, and different causes of action. The court noted the appellant had ample opportunity to present evidence during trial and failed to file the proper procedural application (Order 41, Rule 27 CPC) for additional evidence. Merely awaiting a Court Commissioner's report does not justify staying the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Documents

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  15. 27-Jun-2025

    Dismissal Order

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  17. 07-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  18. 24-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  19. 03-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  20. 07-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  21. 04-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  22. 08-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  23. 25-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  25. 25-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  26. 27-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  27. 15-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  28. 02-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  29. 08-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  30. 27-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  31. 01-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  32. 07-Jul-2023

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  33. 29-Apr-2023

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  34. 23-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  35. 31-Jan-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  36. 12-Dec-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  37. 31-Oct-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  38. 30-Jul-2022

    Payment of Paper Book Charges

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  39. 24-Jun-2022

    Payment of Paper Book Charges

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  40. 05-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 05-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Regular Civil Appeal No. 10/2022 Outcome: The application to stay proceedings is dismissed. Ajit Pandurang Kesarkar sought to stay his appeal pending a Court Commissioner's report from a related civil suit, arguing the report would help establish encroachment on the property. The District Judge rejected this, finding the two suits involved different properties, different respondents, and different causes of action. The court noted the appellant had ample opportunity to present evidence during trial and failed to file the proper procedural application (Order 41, Rule 27 CPC) for additional evidence. Merely awaiting a Court Commissioner's report does not justify staying the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case