Vinayak Ashok Sangavkar vs The State Of Maharashtra Chandgad police station — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO080001432026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinayak Ashok Sangavkar
Adv. Manisha U. Kanade
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Chandgad police station
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 17/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vinayak Ashok Sangaonkar in a fraud case (IPC §420) involving alleged non-repayment of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found that custodial interrogation was not justified due to the three-year delay between the 2023 transaction and 2026 FIR filing, lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to receiving funds, and the complainant's status as a merchant who invested for trading profits. Bail was granted subject to weekly police station reporting and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 17/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vinayak Ashok Sangaonkar in a fraud case (IPC §420) involving alleged non-repayment of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found that custodial interrogation was not justified due to the three-year delay between the 2023 transaction and 2026 FIR filing, lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to receiving funds, and the complainant's status as a merchant who invested for trading profits. Bail was granted subject to weekly police station reporting and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts