Vinayak Ashok Sangavkar vs The State Of Maharashtra Chandgad police station — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO080001432026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vinayak Ashok Sangavkar
Adv. Manisha U. Kanade
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra Chandgad police station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 17/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vinayak Ashok Sangaonkar in a fraud case (IPC §420) involving alleged non-repayment of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found that custodial interrogation was not justified due to the three-year delay between the 2023 transaction and 2026 FIR filing, lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to receiving funds, and the complainant's status as a merchant who invested for trading profits. Bail was granted subject to weekly police station reporting and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
27-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
District Judge-2 And Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
Case Summary: 17/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vinayak Ashok Sangaonkar in a fraud case (IPC §420) involving alleged non-repayment of Rs. 10 lakhs. The court found that custodial interrogation was not justified due to the three-year delay between the 2023 transaction and 2026 FIR filing, lack of direct evidence linking the applicant to receiving funds, and the complainant's status as a merchant who invested for trading profits. Bail was granted subject to weekly police station reporting and document production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts