Kedari Yallappa Patil vs Administrator, Grampanchayat — 3/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 rule 1 (r). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 22nd April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO080000732026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
50/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kedari Yallappa Patil
Respondent(s)
Administrator, Grampanchayat
Village officer Grampanchayat
Satuppa Ramchandra Patil
Arjun Narayan Patel
Dilip Nagoji Parit
Ramesh Mahadev Yadav
Devappa Bhagoji Bokade
Pandurang Krishna Benake
Maruti Bhagoji Benake
Shivaji Jotiba Tupare
Tanaji Pandurang Gadkari
Subhash Punappa Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District Judge dismissed the appellant's (Kedari Yallappa Patil) miscellaneous civil appeal with costs, upholding the lower court's rejection of his temporary injunction application. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because he did not properly describe the suit property's boundaries—his purchased plot (No. 32, measuring 2.1 guntha) did not include the open land between the plot and the Belgav-Vengurla road, which belongs to the Grampanchayat. Without proving clear title or possession to the disputed property, the court ruled that no injunction could be granted to restrain the defendants (Grampanchayat officials and other respondents) from their actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District Judge dismissed the appellant's (Kedari Yallappa Patil) miscellaneous civil appeal with costs, upholding the lower court's rejection of his temporary injunction application. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because he did not properly describe the suit property's boundaries—his purchased plot (No. 32, measuring 2.1 guntha) did not include the open land between the plot and the Belgav-Vengurla road, which belongs to the Grampanchayat. Without proving clear title or possession to the disputed property, the court ruled that no injunction could be granted to restrain the defendants (Grampanchayat officials and other respondents) from their actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts