Kedari Yallappa Patil vs Administrator, Grampanchayat — 3/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 rule 1 (r). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 22nd April 2026.

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHKO080000732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Court

Add District Court , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 41 rule 1 (r)

Petitioner(s)

Kedari Yallappa Patil

Respondent(s)

Administrator, Grampanchayat

Village officer Grampanchayat

Satuppa Ramchandra Patil

Arjun Narayan Patel

Dilip Nagoji Parit

Ramesh Mahadev Yadav

Devappa Bhagoji Bokade

Pandurang Krishna Benake

Maruti Bhagoji Benake

Shivaji Jotiba Tupare

Tanaji Pandurang Gadkari

Subhash Punappa Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

22-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Judgment

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The District Judge dismissed the appellant's (Kedari Yallappa Patil) miscellaneous civil appeal with costs, upholding the lower court's rejection of his temporary injunction application. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because he did not properly describe the suit property's boundaries—his purchased plot (No. 32, measuring 2.1 guntha) did not include the open land between the plot and the Belgav-Vengurla road, which belongs to the Grampanchayat. Without proving clear title or possession to the disputed property, the court ruled that no injunction could be granted to restrain the defendants (Grampanchayat officials and other respondents) from their actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District Judge dismissed the appellant's (Kedari Yallappa Patil) miscellaneous civil appeal with costs, upholding the lower court's rejection of his temporary injunction application. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case because he did not properly describe the suit property's boundaries—his purchased plot (No. 32, measuring 2.1 guntha) did not include the open land between the plot and the Belgav-Vengurla road, which belongs to the Grampanchayat. Without proving clear title or possession to the disputed property, the court ruled that no injunction could be granted to restrain the defendants (Grampanchayat officials and other respondents) from their actions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Add District Court , Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case