Mahadev Jotiba Patil (Deceased)(Legal Heir) vs President Devasthan Sthanik Sallagar Samiti — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHKO080000292026

e-Filing Number

01-10-2025

Filing Number

18/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

Add District Court , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Jotiba Patil (Deceased)(Legal Heir)

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR1.

  2. 2.Malu Mahadev Patil

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR1.

  3. 3.Abhay Mahadev Patil through POA Holder Shirish Sadashiv Patil

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR

  4. 4.Sadashiv Jotiba Patil Deceased(Legal Heir)

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR2.

  5. 5.Sindhu Sadashiv Patil

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR2.

  6. 6.Shirish Sadashiv Patil

    Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.President Devasthan Sthanik Sallagar Samiti

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed Mahadev Patil's miscellaneous civil appeal against the Devasthan Committee but granted his application for a four-week extension of the existing status-quo order to allow time to file an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The court balanced the appellants' legal right to appeal with the respondent's interest in completing temple construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  14. 30-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  15. 23-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  16. 19-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj

  17. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Mahadev Patil's miscellaneous civil appeal against the Devasthan Committee but granted his application for a four-week extension of the existing status-quo order to allow time to file an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The court balanced the appellants' legal right to appeal with the respondent's interest in completing temple construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case