Mahadev Jotiba Patil (Deceased)(Legal Heir) vs President Devasthan Sthanik Sallagar Samiti — 1/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHKO080000292026
e-Filing Number
01-10-2025
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
Add District Court , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Jotiba Patil (Deceased)(Legal Heir)
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR1.
Malu Mahadev Patil
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR1.
Abhay Mahadev Patil through POA Holder Shirish Sadashiv Patil
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR
Sadashiv Jotiba Patil Deceased(Legal Heir)
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR2.
Sindhu Sadashiv Patil
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR2.
Shirish Sadashiv Patil
Adv. HAVALDAR PRAMOD PRABHAKAR
Respondent(s)
President Devasthan Sthanik Sallagar Samiti
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sessions Judge Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Mahadev Patil's miscellaneous civil appeal against the Devasthan Committee but granted his application for a four-week extension of the existing status-quo order to allow time to file an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The court balanced the appellants' legal right to appeal with the respondent's interest in completing temple construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed Mahadev Patil's miscellaneous civil appeal against the Devasthan Committee but granted his application for a four-week extension of the existing status-quo order to allow time to file an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The court balanced the appellants' legal right to appeal with the respondent's interest in completing temple construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts