State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station vs Kadappa Mallikharjuna Dung — 1247/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 75a. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 01st June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO070026012025
e-Filing Number
27-03-2025
Filing Number
1713/2025
Filing Date
05-11-2025
Registration No
1247/2025
Registration Date
05-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Police Station Jaysingpur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Kadappa Mallikharjuna Dung
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Disposed
Appearance
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 01-04-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 24-02-2026 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Jaysingpur Judicial Magistrate Court stopped proceedings against Kadappa Mallikarjun Dang under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, for an alleged offense under Section 75(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, with warrants remaining unserved, making further case adjournment futile. The accused was consequently released and deemed discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jaysingpur Judicial Magistrate Court stopped proceedings against Kadappa Mallikarjun Dang under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, for an alleged offense under Section 75(a) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, with warrants remaining unserved, making further case adjournment futile. The accused was consequently released and deemed discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts