Vandana Subhash Potadar vs Parvati Ramesh Hatalage Advocate - C. S. Killedar — 76/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 31,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHKO070024272023
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
29-09-2023
Filing Number
741/2023
Filing Date
29-09-2023
Registration No
76/2023
Registration Date
04-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vandana Subhash Potadar
Adv. S. T. Chougule
Geeta Subhash Potadar
Adv. CHOUGULE SHRIKANT TATOBA
Gyatri Mahesh Potadar
Adv. CHOUGULE SHRIKANT TATOBA
Prasad Manohar Sajanikar
Adv. CHOUGULE SHRIKANT TATOBA
Respondent(s)
Parvati Ramesh Hatalage Advocate - C. S. Killedar
Rajendra Mahaling Pise
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to add a relief for mandatory injunction for removal of illegal construction by Defendant No.1, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost. The plaintiffs must file the amended plaint within 14 days. The court found the proposed amendment would not change the nature of the suit for declaration and cancellation of sale-deed, and defendant's grievances could be addressed through cost and their right to contravene facts during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to add a relief for mandatory injunction for removal of illegal construction by Defendant No.1, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost. The plaintiffs must file the amended plaint within 14 days. The court found the proposed amendment would not change the nature of the suit for declaration and cancellation of sale-deed, and defendant's grievances could be addressed through cost and their right to contravene facts during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts