Subhash Babgonda Patil vs None — 54/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070024252025
e-Filing Number
09-10-2025
Filing Number
903/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Babgonda Patil
Adv. B. A. Joshi
Vimal Algonda Patil
Adv. B. A. Joshi
Respondent(s)
None
Hearing History
Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 54/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioners' application for a heirship certificate. Only petitioner Subhash Babgonda Patil (petitioner no. 1) was declared the legal heir of the deceased Dhangonda Babgonda Patil, while petitioner no. 2 (Vimal Algonda Patil) was not recognized as an heir. The court applied the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Class II heirs) and determined that petitioner no. 1, being the full brother of the deceased, qualifies as a Class II heir, whereas petitioner no. 2 lacked the requisite relationship to inherit under the applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 54/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioners' application for a heirship certificate. Only petitioner Subhash Babgonda Patil (petitioner no. 1) was declared the legal heir of the deceased Dhangonda Babgonda Patil, while petitioner no. 2 (Vimal Algonda Patil) was not recognized as an heir. The court applied the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Class II heirs) and determined that petitioner no. 1, being the full brother of the deceased, qualifies as a Class II heir, whereas petitioner no. 2 lacked the requisite relationship to inherit under the applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts