Subhash Babgonda Patil vs None — 54/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO070024252025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

903/2025

Filing Date

14-10-2025

Registration No

54/2025

Registration Date

16-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Subhash Babgonda Patil

Adv. B. A. Joshi

Vimal Algonda Patil

Adv. B. A. Joshi

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

08-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

Arguments

23-04-2026

Arguments

11-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 54/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioners' application for a heirship certificate. Only petitioner Subhash Babgonda Patil (petitioner no. 1) was declared the legal heir of the deceased Dhangonda Babgonda Patil, while petitioner no. 2 (Vimal Algonda Patil) was not recognized as an heir. The court applied the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Class II heirs) and determined that petitioner no. 1, being the full brother of the deceased, qualifies as a Class II heir, whereas petitioner no. 2 lacked the requisite relationship to inherit under the applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 54/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioners' application for a heirship certificate. Only petitioner Subhash Babgonda Patil (petitioner no. 1) was declared the legal heir of the deceased Dhangonda Babgonda Patil, while petitioner no. 2 (Vimal Algonda Patil) was not recognized as an heir. The court applied the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Class II heirs) and determined that petitioner no. 1, being the full brother of the deceased, qualifies as a Class II heir, whereas petitioner no. 2 lacked the requisite relationship to inherit under the applicable law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case