Mahavir Bhupal Patil vs Devgonda Alias Ajit Appaso Alias Jingonda Patil — 89/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHKO070024132024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-11-2024
Filing Number
756/2024
Filing Date
08-11-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
12-11-2024
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
19-Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahavir Bhupal Patil
Adv. M. B. Shaikh
Respondent(s)
Devgonda Alias Ajit Appaso Alias Jingonda Patil
Minika Ajit Alias Devgonda Patil
Akshay Ajit Alias Devgonda Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 19-Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 09-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.3 under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint on grounds of limitation has been rejected. The court found that while the agreement to sell was dated 10.12.2016, since no specific performance date was mentioned, the limitation period of three years commenced from 29.09.2024—when the defendant refused to execute the sale deed—not from the agreement date. As the suit was filed on 08.11.2024, it falls within the prescribed limitation period and cannot be summarily rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.3 under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint on grounds of limitation has been rejected. The court found that while the agreement to sell was dated 10.12.2016, since no specific performance date was mentioned, the limitation period of three years commenced from 29.09.2024—when the defendant refused to execute the sale deed—not from the agreement date. As the suit was filed on 08.11.2024, it falls within the prescribed limitation period and cannot be summarily rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts