State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station vs Dipali Sunil Bhanuse — 185/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO070020392025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-08-2025

Filing Number

1288/2025

Filing Date

22-08-2025

Registration No

185/2025

Registration Date

22-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

Decision Date

25th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

494

Police Station

Police Station Jaysingpur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Dipali Sunil Bhanuse

Sudarshan Sunil Bhanuse

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

25-05-2026

Disposed

08-05-2026

Arguments

07-05-2026

Arguments

28-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

25-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case 185/2025 Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dipali Sunil Bhanuse of charges under Indian Penal Code 2023, sections 118(1) and 3(5), due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of December 24, 2024, where the accused allegedly struck the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injury. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (a panchnama witness and the complainant) failed to corroborate the allegations in their testimonies. Neither witness confirmed details of the alleged assault, and the complainant declined to provide additional evidence despite opportunity. The court held that the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt through concrete evidence, and absent such proof, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 185/2025 Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dipali Sunil Bhanuse of charges under Indian Penal Code 2023, sections 118(1) and 3(5), due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of December 24, 2024, where the accused allegedly struck the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injury. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (a panchnama witness and the complainant) failed to corroborate the allegations in their testimonies. Neither witness confirmed details of the alleged assault, and the complainant declined to provide additional evidence despite opportunity. The court held that the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt through concrete evidence, and absent such proof, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case