State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station vs Dipali Sunil Bhanuse — 185/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO070020392025
e-Filing Number
22-08-2025
Filing Number
1288/2025
Filing Date
22-08-2025
Registration No
185/2025
Registration Date
22-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Decision Date
25th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
494
Police Station
Police Station Jaysingpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Dipali Sunil Bhanuse
Sudarshan Sunil Bhanuse
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 185/2025 Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dipali Sunil Bhanuse of charges under Indian Penal Code 2023, sections 118(1) and 3(5), due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of December 24, 2024, where the accused allegedly struck the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injury. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (a panchnama witness and the complainant) failed to corroborate the allegations in their testimonies. Neither witness confirmed details of the alleged assault, and the complainant declined to provide additional evidence despite opportunity. The court held that the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt through concrete evidence, and absent such proof, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 185/2025 Summary Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Dipali Sunil Bhanuse of charges under Indian Penal Code 2023, sections 118(1) and 3(5), due to insufficient prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of December 24, 2024, where the accused allegedly struck the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injury. Key Reasoning: The two prosecution witnesses (a panchnama witness and the complainant) failed to corroborate the allegations in their testimonies. Neither witness confirmed details of the alleged assault, and the complainant declined to provide additional evidence despite opportunity. The court held that the prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt through concrete evidence, and absent such proof, the accused deserves the benefit of doubt under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts