State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station vs Sunny Raghunath Birane — 828/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO070017832025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-07-2025

Filing Number

1086/2025

Filing Date

29-07-2025

Registration No

828/2025

Registration Date

29-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

418

Police Station

Police Station Shirol

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Sunny Raghunath Birane

Hearing History

Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

13-05-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

16-03-2026

Evidence

05-01-2026

Notice_Unready

16-10-2025

Notice_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

13-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 828/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Jaysinghpur acquitted Sunny Raghunath Birane of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) on May 13, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquid was indeed illicit alcohol or that it was in the accused's possession without authorization. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one witness (a seizure panchanama witness) who could not corroborate the contents of the seizure panchanama and testified he was unaware of the details. The prosecution provided no chemical analysis report, independent corroborating witnesses, or documentary evidence linking the seized material to the accused. Due to these gaps and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, the burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 828/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Jaysinghpur acquitted Sunny Raghunath Birane of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) on May 13, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquid was indeed illicit alcohol or that it was in the accused's possession without authorization. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one witness (a seizure panchanama witness) who could not corroborate the contents of the seizure panchanama and testified he was unaware of the details. The prosecution provided no chemical analysis report, independent corroborating witnesses, or documentary evidence linking the seized material to the accused. Due to these gaps and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, the burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case