State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station vs Sunny Raghunath Birane — 828/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO070017832025
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
1086/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
828/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
418
Police Station
Police Station Shirol
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Sunny Raghunath Birane
Hearing History
Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 16-10-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 828/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Jaysinghpur acquitted Sunny Raghunath Birane of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) on May 13, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquid was indeed illicit alcohol or that it was in the accused's possession without authorization. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one witness (a seizure panchanama witness) who could not corroborate the contents of the seizure panchanama and testified he was unaware of the details. The prosecution provided no chemical analysis report, independent corroborating witnesses, or documentary evidence linking the seized material to the accused. Due to these gaps and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, the burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 828/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Jaysinghpur acquitted Sunny Raghunath Birane of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) on May 13, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquid was indeed illicit alcohol or that it was in the accused's possession without authorization. Key Reasoning: The prosecution relied solely on one witness (a seizure panchanama witness) who could not corroborate the contents of the seizure panchanama and testified he was unaware of the details. The prosecution provided no chemical analysis report, independent corroborating witnesses, or documentary evidence linking the seized material to the accused. Due to these gaps and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, the burden of proof was not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts