Shri Nitin Kallappa Jamdade vs Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust Through Shri Vijay Jaypal Magdum Advocate - P. S. Botongale — 69/2017
Case under Contempt of Court Act Section 115. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070017512017
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
827/2017
Filing Date
15-12-2017
Registration No
69/2017
Registration Date
19-12-2017
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Nitin Kallappa Jamdade
Adv. U. V. Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust Through Shri Vijay Jaypal Magdum Advocate - P. S. Botongale
Sou. Sonali Vijay Magdum
Arinjay Jingonda Patil
Dr Shitalkumar Jingonda Patil
Sahebrao Shankar Hol
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 17-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc. Civil Application No. 69/2017 The application filed by Shri Nitin Kallappa Jamdade under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC seeking permission to amend the description of suit property was allowed. The court held that truthfulness of amended contents is not a pre-condition for granting amendment; such matters are decided at trial conclusion. The applicant must pay Rs. 500 cost to opponents and submit the amended copy on record, failing which the order will be cancelled and proceedings will continue without amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc. Civil Application No. 69/2017 The application filed by Shri Nitin Kallappa Jamdade under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC seeking permission to amend the description of suit property was allowed. The court held that truthfulness of amended contents is not a pre-condition for granting amendment; such matters are decided at trial conclusion. The applicant must pay Rs. 500 cost to opponents and submit the amended copy on record, failing which the order will be cancelled and proceedings will continue without amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts