Bharat Rupsing Tamayache vs Nitin Mahindre Vyas — 38/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 15, 37, 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHKO070013312021

Filing Number

607/2021

Filing Date

22-Oct-2021

Registration No

38/2021

Registration Date

25-Oct-2021

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 15, 37, 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Rupsing Tamayache

    Adv. S. V. Daribe

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Mahindre Vyas

  2. 2.Archana Nitin Vyas

  3. 3.Diwan Hosing Finance Limited (DHFL) Through Branch Officer

  4. 4.Padmavati Developers Through Wista Core Life Space Developers India Pvt.Ltd Through Authorized Offi

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  4. 02-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  6. 16-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  7. 19-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  8. 22-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  9. 12-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  10. 20-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  11. 25-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  12. 13-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  13. 15-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  14. 23-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  15. 26-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  16. 25-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  17. 21-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  18. 10-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  19. 03-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  20. 14-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  21. 06-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  22. 18-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  23. 12-Jul-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  24. 21-Apr-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  25. 24-Feb-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  26. 21-Jan-2023

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  27. 16-Dec-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  28. 15-Nov-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  29. 02-Sep-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  30. 29-Jul-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  31. 20-Jun-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  32. 25-Apr-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  33. 19-Mar-2022

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  34. 03-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  35. 18-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  36. 21-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  37. 15-Dec-2021

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 38/2021 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Injunction granted against defendants 1, 2, and 4 restraining them from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the suit property or creating third-party interests until suit disposal. Injunction against defendant 3 (DHFL) rejected. Key Facts: Plaintiff sought specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 20/11/2018 (for Rs. 23,60,000) and a consent deed from 6/8/2021. Plaintiff held possession and had made payments, but defendants 1 and 2 refused to execute the sale deed, citing outstanding loan obligations to DHFL. The court found plaintiff established a prima facie case against defendants 1, 2, and 4 but rejected claims against DHFL, as it held superior charge over the property and no evidence of unlawful interference was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  38. 15-Dec-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  39. 10-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  40. 08-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  41. 07-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  42. 06-Dec-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  43. 20-Nov-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  44. 25-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 22-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 38/2021 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Injunction granted against defendants 1, 2, and 4 restraining them from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the suit property or creating third-party interests until suit disposal. Injunction against defendant 3 (DHFL) rejected. Key Facts: Plaintiff sought specific performance of a property sale agreement dated 20/11/2018 (for Rs. 23,60,000) and a consent deed from 6/8/2021. Plaintiff held possession and had made payments, but defendants 1 and 2 refused to execute the sale deed, citing outstanding loan obligations to DHFL. The court found plaintiff established a prima facie case against defendants 1, 2, and 4 but rejected claims against DHFL, as it held superior charge over the property and no evidence of unlawful interference was presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case