State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station vs Manthan Rajendra Chandure Advocate - S. G. Jagadale — 119/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO070010462024

e-Filing Number

05-03-2024

Filing Number

684/2024

Filing Date

18-Jun-2024

Registration No

119/2024

Registration Date

18-Jun-2024

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

285

Police Station

Police Station Jaysingpur

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manthan Rajendra Chandure Advocate - S. G. Jagadale

  2. 2.Amol Rajendra Chandure

  3. 3.Vijay Mahavir Patil Alias Katare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 119/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Manthan Rajendra Chandure, Amol Rajendra Chandure, and Vijay Mahavir Patil) under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, and 34 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and abusive conduct beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant (Dinkar Shankar Ghatage) filed an FIR alleging the accused jointly beat and abused him with stones and sticks, causing injury, his testimony during trial contradicted the allegations—he could not recall the incident details and failed to corroborate the prosecution's claims. Without credible evidence substantiating the charges, the court found the case unproven and granted the accused acquittal with personal bond conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  13. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  15. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  16. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  17. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  18. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  19. 17-Aug-2024

    Filing of Surety

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

  20. 28-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 18-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 119/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all three accused (Manthan Rajendra Chandure, Amol Rajendra Chandure, and Vijay Mahavir Patil) under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, and 34 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and abusive conduct beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant (Dinkar Shankar Ghatage) filed an FIR alleging the accused jointly beat and abused him with stones and sticks, causing injury, his testimony during trial contradicted the allegations—he could not recall the incident details and failed to corroborate the prosecution's claims. Without credible evidence substantiating the charges, the court found the case unproven and granted the accused acquittal with personal bond conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case