Chandsaheb Hasan Sutar vs Hon Tahsildarso Shirol Advocate - A. M. Kulkarni — 120/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO070010452025

e-Filing Number

08-05-2025

Filing Number

550/2025

Filing Date

08-May-2025

Registration No

120/2025

Registration Date

09-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

19-Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1.Chandsaheb Hasan Sutar

Adv. G. M. Salokhe
2.Ismail Hasan Sutar

Adv. G. M. Salokhe

Respondent(s)

1.Hon Tahsildarso Shirol Advocate - A. M. Kulkarni
2.Haji Jannatbi Gulab Sutar
3.Shahajahan Gulab Sutar
4.Aafrin Javed Mujawar
5.Mustak Ahamad Mansur Mujawar
6.Jayant Srirang Mudalgikar
7.Nurjaha Gajbar Sutar
8.Iqbal Mahmdahnif Sutar
9.Sana Gajbar Sutar
10.Aashpak Gajbar Sutar
11.Nuruddin Rajak Sutar
12.Shabana Mustak Mahamad Mujawar
13.Kohinoor Agro Processing Co Op Society Ltd By Mustaq Ahmad Mansoor Mujawar
14.Mikaj Shahajahan Sutar

Case History

18-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
07-May-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
20-Apr-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
06-Apr-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
04-Apr-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
16-Mar-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
07-Feb-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
17-Jan-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
15-Dec-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: 120/2025 Outcome: The application filed by defendants 3, 4, and 14 to frame a preliminary issue on non-joinder of necessary party was rejected. The court held that the issue of non-joinder is a mixed question of law and fact, not a pure legal matter qualifying for preliminary issue framing under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC. Since the plaintiffs' suit challenges only the Tahsildar's order (not the Collector's), the Collector is not a necessary party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Dec-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
01-Dec-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
05-Nov-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
04-Oct-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
04-Oct-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
15-Sep-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
18-Aug-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
18-Aug-2025

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
22-Jul-2025

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
05-Jul-2025

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
20-Jun-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Jun-2025

Amended Plaint

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
12-Jun-2025

Summons_Ready

Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur
09-May-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
08-May-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 120/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 120/2025 Outcome: The application filed by defendants 3, 4, and 14 to frame a preliminary issue on non-joinder of necessary party was rejected. The court held that the issue of non-joinder is a mixed question of law and fact, not a pure legal matter qualifying for preliminary issue framing under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC. Since the plaintiffs' suit challenges only the Tahsildar's order (not the Collector's), the Collector is not a necessary party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.