Kumar Baburao Koli vs Lobhaji Dada Koli — 40/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10,34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 28-Jul-2026

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHKO070008572024

e-Filing Number

03-05-2024

Filing Number

323/2024

Filing Date

03-May-2024

Registration No

40/2024

Registration Date

04-May-2024

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

19-Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 10,34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kumar Baburao Koli

    Adv. A. I. Jadhav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lobhaji Dada Koli

  2. 2.Suresh Appaso Magdum

    Adv. U. M. Kulkarni

Case History

  1. 28-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  10. 04-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 40/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and imposed cost in cause. Key Points: Kumar Baburao Koli sought specific performance of a mortgage-by-conditional-sale deed and permanent injunction restraining defendants from obstructing his possession and executing a rival decree. The court found: (1) the conditional sale clause in the 2014 mortgage deed violated the equity of redemption doctrine and was invalid; (2) the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform, having paid only a fraction of the consideration; (3) the suit was barred by limitation—filed in May 2024, over three years after the plaintiff's notice of the defendant's refusal in February 2019; and (4) since the main relief is unentitled, consequential interim reliefs cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  12. 26-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  13. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  14. 11-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Jaysingpur

  17. 27-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  19. 16-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  21. 15-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  22. 03-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  23. 29-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  24. 08-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  25. 25-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  27. 10-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Jaysingpur.

  28. 08-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 03-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 40/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction and imposed cost in cause. Key Points: Kumar Baburao Koli sought specific performance of a mortgage-by-conditional-sale deed and permanent injunction restraining defendants from obstructing his possession and executing a rival decree. The court found: (1) the conditional sale clause in the 2014 mortgage deed violated the equity of redemption doctrine and was invalid; (2) the plaintiff failed to demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform, having paid only a fraction of the consideration; (3) the suit was barred by limitation—filed in May 2024, over three years after the plaintiff's notice of the defendant's refusal in February 2019; and (4) since the main relief is unentitled, consequential interim reliefs cannot be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case