State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station vs Mahesh Balsingh Rajaput — 287/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 75A. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 16th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO070006302026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
479/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
287/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
453
Police Station
Police Station Jaysingpur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Jaysingpur Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Balsingh Rajaput
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 287/2026 Summary: Mahesh Balsing Rajput, a 40-year-old teacher, was charged with being found in a drunken state in a public place on 16/12/2025, violating Section 75(A) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Jaysingpur. The court convicted him under Section 275 of B.N.S.S., 2023 and imposed lenient sentencing—simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a Rs. 500 fine (with 2 days alternate imprisonment in default)—citing his status as sole family breadwinner, poverty, and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 287/2026 Summary: Mahesh Balsing Rajput, a 40-year-old teacher, was charged with being found in a drunken state in a public place on 16/12/2025, violating Section 75(A) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Jaysingpur. The court convicted him under Section 275 of B.N.S.S., 2023 and imposed lenient sentencing—simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a Rs. 500 fine (with 2 days alternate imprisonment in default)—citing his status as sole family breadwinner, poverty, and lack of prior criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts