Ajay Nandkishor Bhattad vs The State of Maharashtra through jaysingpur police station — 58/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO070005522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

420/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

Decision Date

11th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Ajay Nandkishor Bhattad

Adv. S. S. Kumbhar

Alaka Nandkishore Bhattad

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra through jaysingpur police station

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur

11-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

04-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

02-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

11-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application of Ajay Nandkishor Bhattad and Alaka Nandkishore Bhattad, directing the Cyber Cell to re-transfer Rs. 75,86,885.81 held in their account back to them. The court found the applicants were not accused in the cyber crime but complainants, and since police had no objection and no other party claimed the funds, there was no purpose in keeping the amount frozen. The re-transfer was granted subject to execution of an indemnity bond for the full amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application of Ajay Nandkishor Bhattad and Alaka Nandkishore Bhattad, directing the Cyber Cell to re-transfer Rs. 75,86,885.81 held in their account back to them. The court found the applicants were not accused in the cyber crime but complainants, and since police had no objection and no other party claimed the funds, there was no purpose in keeping the amount frozen. The re-transfer was granted subject to execution of an indemnity bond for the full amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case