Vishal Narasu Burase vs Rajkumar Jinappa Demanna — 35/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO070005132026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Narasu Burase

    Adv. R. A. Magdum

  2. 2.Vijay Narasu Burase

    Adv. R. A. Magdum

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar Jinappa Demanna

  2. 2.Rahul Alias Ranjit Jinappa Demanna

  3. 3.Vaishali Sanjay Chaugule

  4. 4.Narasu Balu Burase

  5. 5.Jinappa Bharmappa Demanna

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Lok Adalat at Jaysingpur disposed of the civil suit between Vishal Narasu Burase and others (plaintiffs) versus Rajkumar Jinappa Demanna and others (defendants) by passing an award based on a compromise settlement agreed by both parties. The court accepted the settlement terms (Exhibit 9), which were read and explained to the parties who acknowledged and signed them, and ordered refund of any court fees paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat at Jaysingpur disposed of the civil suit between Vishal Narasu Burase and others (plaintiffs) versus Rajkumar Jinappa Demanna and others (defendants) by passing an award based on a compromise settlement agreed by both parties. The court accepted the settlement terms (Exhibit 9), which were read and explained to the parties who acknowledged and signed them, and ordered refund of any court fees paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case