Shahnavaj Vahab Husen vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station — 42/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070004572026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
358/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Police Station Shirol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shahnavaj Vahab Husen
Adv. T. F. Attar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim possession of a seized Oppo mobile handset and Airtel SIM card, finding the applicant established prima-facie ownership with no conflicting claims and recognizing risks of device damage in police custody. The court granted conditional release requiring a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, panchnama documentation with photographs, and restrictions against selling or modifying the device until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
05-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
25-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2026
The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim possession of a seized Oppo mobile handset and Airtel SIM card, finding the applicant established prima-facie ownership with no conflicting claims and recognizing risks of device damage in police custody. The court granted conditional release requiring a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, panchnama documentation with photographs, and restrictions against selling or modifying the device until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts