Shahnavaj Vahab Husen vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station — 42/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070004572026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
358/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Police Station Shirol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahnavaj Vahab Husen
Adv. T. F. Attar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Disposed
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Notice_Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 25-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim possession of a seized Oppo mobile handset and Airtel SIM card, finding the applicant established prima-facie ownership with no conflicting claims and recognizing risks of device damage in police custody. The court granted conditional release requiring a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, panchnama documentation with photographs, and restrictions against selling or modifying the device until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim possession of a seized Oppo mobile handset and Airtel SIM card, finding the applicant established prima-facie ownership with no conflicting claims and recognizing risks of device damage in police custody. The court granted conditional release requiring a Rs. 10,000 indemnity bond, panchnama documentation with photographs, and restrictions against selling or modifying the device until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts