Shahnavaj Vahab Husen vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO070003212026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

242/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

Police Station Shirol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shahnavaj Vahab Husen

Adv. T. F. Attar

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

10-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Arguments

17-02-2026

Reply/Say

07-02-2026

First Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and granted interim custody of the seized Suzuki motorcycle to the owner, Shahnavaj Vahab Husen, after he demonstrated prima facie ownership through registration certificate and identity proof. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,10,000, cannot sell or modify the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it as directed; the investigating officer will prepare a panchnama and photographs for evidence purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and granted interim custody of the seized Suzuki motorcycle to the owner, Shahnavaj Vahab Husen, after he demonstrated prima facie ownership through registration certificate and identity proof. The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,10,000, cannot sell or modify the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it as directed; the investigating officer will prepare a panchnama and photographs for evidence purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case