Arjun Rajendra Gurav vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station — 35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO070003002026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

229/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

FIR Details

FIR Number

379

Police Station

Police Station Shirol

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Arjun Rajendra Gurav

Adv. A. D. Bhandare

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.

10-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

W.S. and Say

17-02-2026

W.S. and Say

07-02-2026

W.S. and Say

05-02-2026

W.S. and Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized religious ornaments (including a Pancdhatu idol and ritual vessels) to applicant Arjun Rajendra Gurav for performing puja, finding he established prima facie entitlement and no prejudice to prosecution. The applicant must execute a ₹20,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the items, and must produce them as directed; the IO shall prepare panchnama and photographs for evidentiary purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of seized religious ornaments (including a Pancdhatu idol and ritual vessels) to applicant Arjun Rajendra Gurav for performing puja, finding he established prima facie entitlement and no prejudice to prosecution. The applicant must execute a ₹20,000 indemnity bond, cannot sell or alter the items, and must produce them as directed; the IO shall prepare panchnama and photographs for evidentiary purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case