Police Inspector, Jaysingpur Police Station vs Abhinandan @ Abhya Rajkumar Patil (Dhadel) Advocate - Gurunath D. Mane — 155/2019
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 142. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO070002882019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
204/2019
Filing Date
31-01-2019
Registration No
155/2019
Registration Date
31-01-2019
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
038
Police Station
Police Station Jaysingpur
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Police Inspector, Jaysingpur Police Station
Adv. A. P. P. S. R. Mirje
Respondent(s)
Abhinandan @ Abhya Rajkumar Patil (Dhadel) Advocate - Gurunath D. Mane
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 17-11-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 13-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped criminal proceedings against Abhinandan @ Aabhya Rajkumar Patil under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged him from charges under Section 142 of the Mumbai Police Act. The court found that despite the case being pending for over 6 years since the 2019 charge-sheet and sufficient opportunities given, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's attendance, making it futile to continue the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped criminal proceedings against Abhinandan @ Aabhya Rajkumar Patil under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged him from charges under Section 142 of the Mumbai Police Act. The court found that despite the case being pending for over 6 years since the 2019 charge-sheet and sufficient opportunities given, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's attendance, making it futile to continue the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts