Raju Bhupal Chougule vs State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station — 34/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 10th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070002782026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
210/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
16-2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Police Station Shirol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Bhupal Chougule
Adv. A. D. Bhandare
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Shirol Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to obtain interim custody of his seized Vivo V40 mobile phone and SIM card, finding that the applicant had proven ownership through verified purchase receipt and Aadhar card. The court granted interim possession on conditions including furnishing a Rs. 15,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on selling or transferring the device without court permission, and an undertaking to produce it as directed during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
24-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
17-Feb-2026
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
07-Feb-2026
Notice_Unready
2nd Joint C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Jaysingpur.
-
04-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 34/2026
The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to obtain interim custody of his seized Vivo V40 mobile phone and SIM card, finding that the applicant had proven ownership through verified purchase receipt and Aadhar card. The court granted interim possession on conditions including furnishing a Rs. 15,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on selling or transferring the device without court permission, and an undertaking to produce it as directed during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts