Savita balaso bhandare vs None — 4/2026

Case under Coasting Vessels Act Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO070000372026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur

Judge

18-3rd Joint CJJD JMFC Jaysingpur

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Coasting Vessels Act Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Savita balaso bhandare

Adv. S. S. Mhalungekar

Vishal balaso bhandare minor through gurdian Savita Balaso Bhandare

Adv. S. S. Mhalungekar

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 18-3rd Joint CJJD JMFC Jaysingpur

10-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

Arguments

12-01-2026

Proclomation

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary This is a civil succession petition (Case No. 04/2026) from a Maharashtra court deciding succession rights under the Bombay Regulation Act. The court held that the petitioner (Smt. Savita Balaso Bhandare) is entitled to inherit the property of the deceased Janabai Gopal Bhandare as the legal heir, as she is the pre-marriage name holder and recognized successor. The court rejected the petition on technical grounds but confirmed the petitioner's inheritance rights through a qualified decree, directing that succession be granted subject to applicable legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a civil succession petition (Case No. 04/2026) from a Maharashtra court deciding succession rights under the Bombay Regulation Act. The court held that the petitioner (Smt. Savita Balaso Bhandare) is entitled to inherit the property of the deceased Janabai Gopal Bhandare as the legal heir, as she is the pre-marriage name holder and recognized successor. The court rejected the petition on technical grounds but confirmed the petitioner's inheritance rights through a qualified decree, directing that succession be granted subject to applicable legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case