Savita balaso bhandare vs None — 4/2026
Case under Coasting Vessels Act Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO070000372026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Sr.Dn. and Jr.Dn. Jaysingpur
Judge
18-3rd Joint Cjjd JMFC Jaysingpur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Savita balaso bhandare
Adv. S. S. Mhalungekar
-
2.Vishal balaso bhandare minor through gurdian Savita Balaso Bhandare
Adv. S. S. Mhalungekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.None
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary This is a civil succession petition (Case No. 04/2026) from a Maharashtra court deciding succession rights under the Bombay Regulation Act. The court held that the petitioner (Smt. Savita Balaso Bhandare) is entitled to inherit the property of the deceased Janabai Gopal Bhandare as the legal heir, as she is the pre-marriage name holder and recognized successor. The court rejected the petition on technical grounds but confirmed the petitioner's inheritance rights through a qualified decree, directing that succession be granted subject to applicable legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Joint Cjjd JMFC Jaysingpur
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
3rd Joint Cjjd JMFC Jaysingpur
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Case Summary This is a civil succession petition (Case No. 04/2026) from a Maharashtra court deciding succession rights under the Bombay Regulation Act. The court held that the petitioner (Smt. Savita Balaso Bhandare) is entitled to inherit the property of the deceased Janabai Gopal Bhandare as the legal heir, as she is the pre-marriage name holder and recognized successor. The court rejected the petition on technical grounds but confirmed the petitioner's inheritance rights through a qualified decree, directing that succession be granted subject to applicable legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts